news.software.readers

Mike Yetto wrote in
news:slrn20070925181236twooffive@ :

> Bada bing Blinky the Shark < @ > bada bang:
>> TwoSheds wrote:
>>>> TwoSheds wrote:
>>
>>>>> Sorry but I don't understand your attitude?
>>
>
> TwoSheds:
> I answered you with history, clues and facts. You took umbrage.
> My atitude since is what you get.
>
>
>>
>>
>>> Surely my ability to do so is dependent on my ISP's retention rates?
>>
>
> TwoSheds:
> Not if there is an archive available, or perhaps some type of
> internet search engine.
>
>> You seem to want to to make assertions, yet you present questions.
Which
>> is your intent?
>>
>>> You didn't allude to anything? Really? In your initial response you
>>> refer to the fact that the entire beta team agreed with the
>>> developer's approach to provide support for single-part jpegs. This
>>> suggests that a discussion took place!
>>
>
> TwoSheds:
> It was a statement of fact, not an allusion.
>
>> Yes. Fully 100% of the beta team agreed with that; in fact, so did
100%
>> of the alpha team. However, due to certain characteristics of the
alpha
>> and beta teams, I don't believe this discussion was recorded.
>>
>>
>
> Blinky:
> I don't think he'll ever pick up on this.
>
> Mike "This is an internym; my childish sig is below" Yetto


Yay!! You now have some support from one of your buddies here!! Now you
can crank it up another notch and be even more arrogant. Good for you.