sci.physics.computational.fluid-dynamics

pokerislotto wrote:
>
> ******************************************************************
> Now we build a Google group called Pokerization of Lottery. You can
> easily find it through Google.
>
> Lottery is NOT a game of chance but a game of MANIPULATION. It is
> this statement that costs the life of our two websites. We sincerely
> invite you to visit our group and look into our Pages carefully. We
> didn't form any syndicate nor ask you to pay anything. We just want
> you to experience the manipulation yourself
>
>
> ******************************************************************
>
>
> When we post the above message into the following two forums :
> 1. SciForum : /,
> 2. Physics Forum : / ,
> our message was removed because we are spamming !! We use the
> username "lottoispoker" and the password "831diana" for the above two
> forums. We are banned forever due to spamming !!
>
>
> We were very surprised to see that by pointing out "lottery is NOT a
> game of chance but a game of MANIPULATION" is actually spamming !!
> This could only be happened to those whose mental complexity is lower
> than mathematicians or physicists, but how come forums run by
> mathematicians or physicists don't find our research very
> interesting ?
>
>
>
>>From Euclidean Geometry to Analytic Geometry to "Seven Bridges of
>
>
> Koenigsberg" to Topology to Point Set Topology, do you find that
> spamming ?
>
>
>>From Geometrical Optics to Duality of Light to Optical Parametric
>
>
> Chirped Pulse Amplification, do you find that spamming ?
>
> We expect you all can understand the meaning of deductive reasoning
> in
> mathematical logic, but by building system based upon deductive
> reasoning with the intention to replace inductive reasoning totally
> is
> not possible. Therefore you cannot solve the prediction of lottery
> outcomes by probability, measure theory or trend analysis if lottery
> is a game of manipulation rather than a game of chance. This is why
> Deep Blue of IBM has to test its capability with the help from Garry
> Kimovich Kasparov rather than using two Deep Blues to play chess
> against one another.
>
>
> Inductive reasoning MUST not be confused with Fuzzy set. We spent
> over 5 years to build the table/graph for those whose mental activity
> is complex enough to read it. With our table/graph, almost everyone
> can see the manipulative moves of lottery house provided you can read
> graph long enough. You can even see the drawing habit of various
> lottery houses !! If you have enough ability to make mathematical
> abstraction, you may develop some formulae to trace the manipulative
> moves of lottery houses.
>
>
> Do you think we are still spamming ?
>
Dear poster,


Although it is not spamming in the sence of advertising a product, still
it does not comply with the subject of this newsgroup. So it is
off-topic posting.


Kind regards,


Jan Gerrit Kootstra