news.software.readers

XS11E wrote:

> Whiskers wrote:
>
>> On 2008-02-27, Dan Beale wrote:
>>> Isn't GNKSA looking a bit old now?
>
> Maybe?
>
>>> Would it be worth creating a GNKSA3 that covers modern Usenet?
>>> Things like "SHOULD open no more than 4 connections to server,
>>> unless server allows more" would be handy, no?
>
> Four is plenty, I'd be much more interested in an international
> enforcement agency that would arrest and punish top posters, those who
> post "test" messages, those who post HTML to text only groups and
> severe punishment for violations of any of the basics:
>
> /~jkorpela/usenet/
>
>> Yes. But who is going to do it?
>
> Al Quida?
>
>>> It'd be useful to me to see a list of what's wrong with, say, Pan
>>> or knode or whatnot.
>>
>> ... or Google Groups ...
>
> There's nothing wrong with Google Groups since the advent of the UIP,
> it's solved the GG problem for me.

To rephrase an old corporate slogan:

Progress against Google Gropers is our most important product.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
Blinky: