news.software.readers

Whiskers wrote:

> On 2008-02-27, Dan Beale wrote:
>> Isn't GNKSA looking a bit old now?

Maybe?

>> Would it be worth creating a GNKSA3 that covers modern Usenet?
>> Things like "SHOULD open no more than 4 connections to server,
>> unless server allows more" would be handy, no?

Four is plenty, I'd be much more interested in an international
enforcement agency that would arrest and punish top posters, those who
post "test" messages, those who post HTML to text only groups and
severe punishment for violations of any of the basics:

/~jkorpela/usenet/

> Yes. But who is going to do it?

Al Quida?

>> It'd be useful to me to see a list of what's wrong with, say, Pan
>> or knode or whatnot.
>
> ... or Google Groups ...

There's nothing wrong with Google Groups since the advent of the UIP,
it's solved the GG problem for me.



--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: